It seems that the shit has truely hit the fan. Unlike the Alias purchase where Max and Maya users were concerened, but in a fairly polite way, about the future of their applications, the SoftImage purchase has been quite the opposite.
I hate to generalize the SoftImage users, but for the most part every hardcore user I have met has been indoctrinated into the "SoftImage is the greatest application ever" mentality from the very first day that they used it (personal opinion: its a good app, just not the 'end all, be all' that people claim). Unfortunately this eventually evolved itself into the whole "Cult of SoftImage", which is where we get our problem that we are in now. A full cross-internet smear campaign where these jokers are bashing what is really the only good move for a true future for SoftImage.
Contrary to what they will like to beleive SoftImage had no future with AVID. According to this
article (which does a great job of outlining the purchase), SoftImage amounted to a paltry sum of $4 million in profit for AVID (on an estimated $16 million in sales). This is an incredibly low amount of money and really outlines how poorly SoftImage tools sold on market. Worse yet it also means that SoftImage tools do not benefit from a R&D level needed to continue to grow and succeed.
"...according to Marc Stevens, General Manager of Softimage, decided that to grow in the 3D market they would need to make a very significant investment and thus the best thing for both Softimage and AVID was to sell the division, "at that point we started a pretty extensive process, we spoke to a lot of people, ... Autodesk was not the first company approached by AVID" he commented to fxguide."
Reading what has been said it is pretty clear there was no future for SoftImage tools at AVID, its sales did not dictate an increase in R&D spending to ensure that the application would grow and AVID itself did not want to risk spending on an application that continued to be a distant #3 application in terms of sales. Yes SoftImage tools had made some good progress over the years, but in terms of where they are now, to where they were 5 years ago, the tools have gone from something incredible to something average simply because the competition has been evolving while SoftImage tools remained essentially stagnent (yes I place Max and Maya in the average level too, and I say average because no app is better than the other 3, it may have an area it excells in but it also has an area its weak in). So it makes no sense to me why the hell the "Cult of SoftImage" would be bashing this idea and Autodesk to no end... well except for the fact that the whole beleive system that made up the "Cult of SoftImage"" came crashing down on their heads.